Search:

wedding video bride bridal shower wedding ceremony groom first dance wedding video production hot wedding video wedding music wedding party wedding gifts wedding reception wedding ring wedding gown wedding anniversary bridal party wedding master ceremonies wedding speech wedding photographer beach wedding hawaii wedding

Bertrand Russell talking about exact thinking in philosophy

Wedding Video Magic
Wedding Video Magic Wedding Video Magic
Wedding Video Magic

Transcript: "But I do like clarity and exact thinking, and I believe that very important to mankind. Because when you allow yourself to think inexactly, your prejudices, your bias, your self-interest, comes in in ways you don't notice, and you do bad things without knowing that you're doing them (self-deception is very easy). So that I do think clear thinking [is] immensely important. But I don't think philosophy in the old-fashioned sense is quite the thing the world needs nowadays. I think its needs are rather different."

Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm
Author: FranksValli

Length: 00:37
Rating: 4.89
Views: 80204

Tags: analytic  Bertrand  clear  philosophy  Russell  thinking  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

spawnfan101 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I don't think that exact thinking completely uninfluenced by emotions or biases is possible, but I do agree that it is essential to recognize (as far as is possible) the nature and effects they have on thoughts and decisions.
mannybb (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Wow, this guy is a complete pencil-neck!!
Skoulikimou (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
OMG is that really him !!do u have more videos of Bertrand Russell?
platypode (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I agree, of course both are bias'. However it's the reasoning (or lack thereof) behind the bias that I'm concerned with. This started with a discussion of the difference between intolerance and prejudice. This is moving away from that.
igneousfizzlebottom (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The "conclusion" is itself going to be inevitably self-serving, therefore biased/subjective/prejudiced/intolerant/whatever ....What more can be said on this?
igneousfizzlebottom (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
FFS = For Fuck Sake.Whether a prejudice towards something be favourable or unfavourable, it is still just a bias.Whether this bias has a reason behind it that you are willing to accept or not, it is still a bias.The concept that we are discussing is whether or not one can assimilate information, data, "facts", from the outside world and come to a conclusion with regard to these "facts" that is not clouded by subjectivity.I don't think one can.
platypode (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Please avoid abbreviations, I'm not familiar with that particular one (FFS). Also, I already explained the distinction and clearly I don't see it that way but one more time for repetition's sake.Prejudice is an unfavorable opinion, or feeling formed either beforehand/without knowledge/thought or reasonIntolerance is also an unfavorable feeling or opinion, however it is formed with knowledge/thought or reason and not beforehand.
igneousfizzlebottom (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I accuse thee of "sprachspiel", umbrageous villain.;)What is the distinction between "prejudism" and tolerance/intolerance?Can you not conceive that to be intolerant of intolerance is itself a bias and therefore a "prejudism"?FFS ...
BoldOriginalFlavor (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
everything human beings think, say and do involves prejudice, so that includes intolerance. that's my view at least
platypode (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Actually the argument I got into was about prejudice and whether intolerance is a form of prejudice. I think maybe you might be able to see why I won't bother arguing that with igneous anymore in light of his views

Wedding Video Magic © 2007 All Rights Reserved.