|
H2earth (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yes, but right now we're interested in the WFC, rather than his later work (which remains under Patent in the U.S. till 2011).
H2earth (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yes, you are. Its possible to create, maintain, and switch high voltage without a large expenditure of energy. The Meyer Effect is *NOT* electrolysis, and depends entirely on voltage; ANY current appears to be counterproductive - including the free electron current arising from ionization and dissociation itself.
H2earth (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Actually, we now have had an engine/alternator running itself off that gas, and powering the WFC, in closed loop. We're collecting some video on that, and hope to have one to post shortly.
bodziobran (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
could you use car ignition coil for testing this circuit ?
cfootball10 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Meyer was a genius. I am thinking smaller, he shrunk all this down at the end
GkillerDogg (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
stan meyers, uses a pulse system, a simple invention in which to basicaly amplify power, thus creating more hydrogen through the electrolisis.
absolom7691 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Have you tried sandblasting the surface of the stainless steel to promote better nucleation? Maybe help give a better escape point for the gas. Just a thought. I am getting ready to build a unit. I am going to try that myself.
wphuang2005 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
i am a newcome i try to build one following D14,do you have any detailed data as output of gas, voltage and current applied. and is it a series cell, or all cells in parallel connection?
H2earth (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
We want to work with you. Message me privately and we'll make it happen.
tree6014 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I have built a cell (hundreds of dollars) and used his (David Lawton's) plans for the pulsing circuit; however, mine is not performing like his. This has created a lot of work for us as scientific researchers. I am going to be incorporating one or two inductors because some of our theorists seem to think that could be the culprit based on new oscilloscope data that is more precise than we had before. |
