|
Falcons66 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The mechanism are such 'complex simplicity', in that in the grand scheme of things its very simple, and yet compared to todays all-electronic stuff, Its quite ingenious that everyting happens based on levers and trip mechanicsms! Cool. Thats why its fun to listen to it 'work', not just the record sound itself.
LEDRavecom (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It was really great of you to share this information. People today don't have an appreciation for the mechanical genius of these pre-electronics machines.
Falcons66 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Thanks. The sound isnt as great as most hifi's, but it does its job well. My 57 zenith has much MUCH more intense, room filling Hi-Fi Sound. Thans for the comment.
teendude16 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It is vey nice furniture, and has good sound, its the 50's, had some of the better made stuff, like this. Thanks for posting.
LHUPA (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
You have a neat apparatus!... Good choice!
m2esectr (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The most plausible explanation is that the position of the hold-down arm is detected during the change cycle, and if it was already completely down at the start of the cycle, then the tonearm returns to its rest.
bpabustan (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Awesome, only one question: If this turntable is made in 1956, is it fully modifiable to reproduce stereo records?
Falcons66 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Nope...Havent had hardly a single problem yet. The ONLY one I can think of happened on the last &* I played (on youtube, philco demonstration record) where upon copleteion of the 78, the tone arm didnt drop into its cradle...but fell an inch short. Otherwise its been flawless.
recordplayerguy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I had two table models of the Philco back in the 80's. I was wondering if yours has the same problem that mine had? I would put a stack of 45's on the changer, and the first one or two would play fine. Then the reject cycle would begin before the record was finished playing. Each record after would reject sooner and sooner to the point that the record would not play at all. If I took the tonearm and moved it all the way towards the spindle and back, it would work fine again for the first 2 discs
EOGGasman (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The cabinet puts out a nice clear bass. |