|
votKakBivaet (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
World's largest sex and swinger personals with over 20,000,000 members looking to hook up with someone just like you!Enter [_SexDating4Free.com_] to Join for FREE
durdomBit (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Enter XXXodour.com_ to Play Full Length XXX Videos 4 FREE
rockygreenmountains (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
this police officer is not at fault. he is employed by ucla and they tell him to do that. it is ucla that has these policies of disrespect for human life. they know they are above the law. this makes ucla too powerful in a free society.
1punkfromcanada (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Here it is spelled out for you. It's real simple. School makes rules. Student breaks rules. Security is called. Student becomes belligerent. Police are called. Student is given commands. Student does not comply. STUDENT MAKES THE CHOICE TO ESCALATE THE SITUATION (this is where the clip starts). Police give more commands. Student resists. Police deal with the situation. Clip is posted on youtube. Then a bunch of you start to bitch.
sprockette (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The video of the incident speaks for itself. He refused to leave or to let the officers carry him out. He was being a punk ass liberal bitch by trying to make some ignorant political statement. But it's UCLA what do you expect??
omegaguitars (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
You're right...not all middle easterners are terrorists, but all the terrorists I've seen doing their dirt against America are middle eastern so wee need profile unfortunately. Welcome to the world created by the terrorists.
charles75111 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I love the fact that those students think this is a protest worthy incident, in England we would just say "oh dear, guess you had a bad day," Still at least you've got a novel excuse to hand in work late: "sorry I'll have it next week, i was busy being filmed getting tased from behind by a bunch of uniformed men."
The12ismine (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Ha, ha, your speculations crack me up--I notice you haven't addressed the main issue, that is racial profiling. I saw the video, I heard officers demanding him to leave, I heard his refusals. Ummmm, did not leave, did not follow reasoned demands, use of force authorized. End of story. I saw your favorites list; since you are one of those asses that think 9/11 was fake, how do know this wasn't just a set up? A government conspiracy? You're so full of shit and now I know why.
loggerbomb (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
You don't respect me? Oh no! Yet you don't even tell me what rule he broke. Why? Because he broke no safety rule, thats why! He WAS trying to leave and they tasered him. How do you expect someone to leave a building when you have a cop on your back TASERING you. You cry about these people protesting, but I am damned sure if something like this happened to you, you would be up in arms something fierce!
The12ismine (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I respect a protest against excessive use of government force. However, I don't respect people like you and those protesting when you ignore the fact he wasn't following a safety rule and refused demands to peacefully leave. But mainly, I can't respect that this case is automatically turned into an issue about racial profiling. |
