|
lou2cv (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I transcribed both Stanley and Mike solos but I did not pay attention how long it took. I'd guess a bit less than an hour for the 2 solos but I'm not sure
confoozled3737 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
How long did that take you?
me007963 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
yeah, sounds tinnier than he usually does, like he was miked from behind or to the side or something, shame.awesome playing though
ParokyaSaCantol (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
now this is jazz..nice
lou2cv (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I just transcribed Mike Brecker's solo, it's really interesting to see what progressions he plays in his "out" phrases.
Eyemayorist (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
huh? WTH happened!?!?!?
lou2cv (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I don't like his playing too but I don't consider he's bad. I'm just not used to this king of playing, but he sure is great, just not my cup of tea
lou2cv (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I don't understand , sound is great here
Pickpocket86 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I think you just don't Understand what he is doing musically... because if you did you would not say that "he sucks" and if he wasnt musical than I doubt he would be where he is the jazz today.....He is not a free jazz artist he plays Jazz
invisiblekid14 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
just because he's a badass, doesn't make him good musically . . . he's just playing a bunch of notes that don't mean shit in the creative musical underground . . . and yeah, his pinky probably has accomplished more than i ever will, but what's that really got to do with creative music? |
