skipp311 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

6 Million? Hasn't that number been OFFICIALLY changed?Auschwitz alone claimed 4 million at first, but 20 years later that number OFFICIALLY went to a little more than 1 million.There are still survivors that claim there were gas chambers at Dachau. And it has since been OFFICIALLY proven that there were no gas chambers at Dachau.Some of these "survivors" still hold to the story that the Germans made lamp shades and soap out of Jews, another OFFICIALLY proven falsehood.

TheIronMole2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I cant believe there are survivors of the holocaust who watched thier friends and family die and have their whole childhood ruined, and years later have some idiot say "all lies"I can guarantee this - anyone who thinks that 6 Million people who just so happened to be all of the same religion vanished for no reason with hundreds of thousands of pieces of evidence thats all coincidental, will NEVER talk face-to-face with a survivor and tell them they are wrong

adrianb2005 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Iwent to Auschwitz in 2007. Since then I struggle to believe the holocaust story in its entirity. There are to many things that just dont add up. The guides were arogant and condescending to any questions slightly deviating from their "official" truth. There is some excellent non-biased material out tere to read. Stop swallowing lies and doones own research. Raoul Hilberg = a big fat contradicting liar

timpovikings (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You can laugh at the evidence, trash it, speculate about it or deny it. But what you cannot do is explain it away or match it with a single confession or admission from one single conspirator who simply couldn't carry the burden of this alleged global fraud any longer.You don't like it, but in 75 years you have changed diddly-zip.You're entitled to an opinion and I respect that. It's still worthless.I stick to the source evidence, from the time and never make mine known.

timpovikings (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You have nothing which explains nazi confessions of both accused and unaccused individuals from 1945 to the 80s and beyond - and not a single denial. Nor can you explain how a hoax could make culpable the nazis, the allies, the survivors, the courts, the press, academia universally and every German Government since. Equally relevant, you cannot explain why Krege, Leuchter, Zundel, Irving and Rudolf had to lie in order to expose this alleged 'truth'.

timpovikings (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Hoess was human. He was also a convicted murderer from long before he arrived at AB. The Baxter book shows his humanity. It also shows his ingenuity in his chosen field of mass murder.As for evidence. The revisionist paradox is that all you have is the doubt you can attach to the substantive evidence of the actual holocaust. You have to acknowledge it before you can find fault with it, for you have no original source evidence of hoax or conspiracy.

timpovikings (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You claimed Hoess signed confessions in a language other than his own, implying that this would indicate a signature to a statement he didn't know the content of. But when you are proved wrong, you find a second way of dismissing that which, by your own implication, you deem more acceptable or conventional. Hoess confessed, fact. And finally asked forgiveness for his crimes in a smuggled - but discovered - note. You clearly have not read the Baxter book on him. He praised his Polish captors.

timpovikings (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

LOL! This really isn't rocket science! You question everything but do so with opinion and speculation, which negates any intellectual point in your own interrogatives. Do you have proof that this number of people CAN'T be placed in such a volume?Hoess, was there - you were not. More speculation creates meaningless conjecture. Metaphorically, you cannot prove I didn't kick your dog and now postulate theories as to why I didn't kick it!

realrasmckhaile (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I asked timpovikings,how could 2000 people be held in an enclosure of 210 square metres,286 people standing in a room measuring 5 meters by 4 meters.He said,get this,"Go look at the record for the number of people in a phone box".I collapsed from laughter.

BackRoadsWine (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

NEVER AGAIN