|
sgResIpsaLoquitur (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
For your info wendyneo, let me remind you that though u might be an aussie belonging to that of a different jurisdiction, under section 3 of the Penal Code, you are still equally liable of an offence committed just as it is being committed in Singapore therein. I surmised it is about time that you cease all anti-pap activities.
sgResIpsaLoquitur (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
thanks kenlam333. I'm beginning to be in consensus with Kenlam333 and FishingSoul. Why? because as I made attempts to defend wendy's assertions, I was obstinately being "corrected" for dubious reasons. Blatantly, when i talked about "founding father", i'm referring to him as being a pioneer in the establishment of Singapore. Only a psychopath would refute that statement in accordance with the bystander test.
kenlam333 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Fantastic comment fishing soul!!!! Kudos to u!!!
FishingSoul (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
right... i am not as despicable as you, trying to cause these tensions here.. you must know, singapore, minus people like you, still have a whole lot of people willing to defend her sovereignty, dog is not a very nice term, but at least it represents loyalty, and you, are like a chicken with no head, cursing your own roots.. are you sure the aussies even want you in their country? i think on the surface maybe they are willing to accept, but you must know, you are forever an immigrant
FishingSoul (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
so you're labeling those living in hdb as weak lor? even in Seoul, Korea, people are going high rise.. it's not a sign of weakness is it? and i'm sorry to tell you.. more than 20% of the people are living in both landed properties and condominiums, so how can your 80% be giving face to the PAP?? and you're forgetting, we have many different types of scholarships.. 1 question, when was the last time you came back? and have you been reading the latest news on what the gov is trying to do?
kenlam333 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
sgreslpsaloquitur, at least i respect u even though we hav sort of different opinion. coz u tok logic...i may sound a bit arrogant but its onli to the wendy pig...nt to the masses....i m nt anti govt nor m i realli pro govt but i do appreciate wat they hav done for singapore...i juz cant stand the way tat pig is making somting outta nuthin...i do cursed when i gt a parking fine too....so i made myself clear...
kenlam333 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
jailed under ISA...nt ISD...pig....
kenlam333 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
LKY jailed him under ISD to snatch power, AND LKY was the one who wanted to join Malaysia - so I don't know what shit you mean by "without pap, we will be under malaysia"! LKY jail him under ISD??? read wat u type correctly....i know better then u...u know the reasons why lky wanted to join?? u r too shallow in the political history of sg wendy....so stop making assumptions...like wat i say grey areas...
wendyneo (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Tax-relief for high-earning grad mothers = $50,000 per child. So, if you have 3 children, you gotta earn $150,000 to fully benefit from it.I do not think I am wrong to say that 80% of the population earn less than $150,000 per year. In fact, I was being generous. More like 90% earn less than that!Likewise, for the other scheme eg pension, tax cap at 20% etc. 500 words does not allow me to fully expand on the topic. But you get the idea:PAP treats >80% of its population like shit.
wendyneo (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
LKY was the one who wanted to join Malaysia, against the Barisan Socialis who oppose joining Malaysia. Hence it was wrong of you to say "if not for LKY, we would still be with malaysia". I repeat: if not for lky, sg wouldn't have joined malaysia in the 1st place!ISA = Internal Security ActISD = ... Department.Again, your ignorance of these two points are evidences that I am talking to an ignorant little boy here. Grow up (and study some history on the way!) |
