|
XGralgrathor (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
« The only question I do have left is where, when and what did the earliest form a of a human being look like? »That would probably be something similar to Homo erectus. Anything earlier, and it'd be not quite recognizable as human. You can find any number of artist's impressions on H. erectus by googling images. But remember: these are only artist's impressions; informed guesses, if you will.
CPTalk (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Amazing video series I must say. The only question I do have left is where, when and what did the earliest form a of a human being look like?
Ix07I (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Great videos!!!I really appreciate the time you put into these.
PQRLOVE (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The sad thing is that rational arguments are rare.You know it's over when you hear 'peer review'. Always a last gasp.There is so much didactic, dictatorial behavior andrigid thinking amongst both science and religion it'sjust silly.
xXAkridXx (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Tnx PQRLOVE, I would have enjoyed a rational argument to my comment instead of thumbs, it appears I offended somebodies religion.My stance on Man made global warming is like like my stance towards religion, show me the evidence. Potholer was able to explain a bit of it to me, but still I am not completely convinced.
PQRLOVE (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Now this is wrong and another example of dictatorial science behavior. The thumbs have been disabled on this. What are you afraid of? All he said was, "Man made global warming is a lie, but excellent job on everything else." He's at least half right.Let the man speak.This is another example of why I say both science and religion ... (sorry I can't find a decent way to really express my disgust).This scientific bigotry makes me mad.
PQRLOVE (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I just can't rewatch this video. I found the didactic approach of absolute certainty to be a total turnoff. I found the argument that science is right about everything it talks about because everything all fits together to be real BS. First it does not fit together. There are anomalies all over the place. Second religion makes the same claim of fitting together. Both of you lie. You both use your special lang. to slant things your way. HOWEVER your climate vid2 was indeed better/real sci.
PQRLOVE (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
This is the fourth insult I've received on YouTube and this is perhaps the funniest. You call me a creationist? LOLROTFAnd that you also call Cremo a crackpot just shows your ignorance. That's a judgment bytheby on your actual words you wrote. Have you ever read one word of alternative science writing? I bet not. You demo. why I say many Scient. are as bad if not worse than preachers. 'My god/science is right and all others are wrong.' is what I hear you saying. That's sick.
KingHodor (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"Oh boy tearing you apart will be too easy."We're anxiously *yawn* waiting for the tearing to commence."So start off reading Cremo and Thompson. They are not particularly Christian so they may better expose your brain to the anomalous data problem."Cremo is a crackpot, which every scientist who's ever heard of the guy knows. To see creationists quoting him shows how desperately they're grasping for straws.
natureboywonder (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Thank you for shining a light into the darkness and giving us hope for real human progress. Nothing is more delicious than knowledge. Keep up the good work. Your videos really brighten my days! |
