conodelamadreputa (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I think he would kill everyone, the bad players, the good players, the players that might defeat him, I think he would only let to live the ones that are amazing, yet not that amazing to defeat him XD

conodelamadreputa (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

2 things.1: Garry Kasparov's ego its INCREDIBLY BIG.2: I dont know how Topalov could hold the jumping and screaming I WON I WON! lol

orangelixir (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I agree with you on his English

inemtsev (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

This was just a one time event that Topalov one, I think in numerous tournaments Kasparov would destroy Topalov just as he would beat Kramnik.

ivikas123456789 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

let me translate:fisher is not the one.he doesn't want to play with karpov,still we don't know is fisher the best.karpov is a very good strong player.maybe he could beat fisher!fisher doesn't play chess too long,he has not play with too many strong c. players.In my opinion kasparov is now the best chess player on the world. I translate my slavic sentences too literaly to english so no one can understan what I'm trying to say.alright,I speak broken english too,and Im also a slav.

Mo0nLigh7 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

u r idiots1. Topalov2. Kasparov3. Anand

cognitivepawn (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

1. Fischer2. Tal3. Karpov

MrPewp (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Lol hes really good compared to me

BASIClvrCh8r (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I realise that English is probably not your first language, but your grammar is so bad that I cannot understand what you are trying to say.

schaperblaster (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Thats Kasparovs way of playing. his game is more of the psychological kind. He does that a lot. But he does it, knowing that some opponents might get influenced by it