|
Davetacular45 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Nah, they just hated each other, or at least got on each other's nerves alot
rocknrollwerewolf (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
What do you guys think? Were they stoned or drunk there? I say probably a little of both.
mintyspace (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Youre still 'special' and as for commas, have you ever heard of 500 word limit. But still you know what commas are, wow thats a shock, I hope you didnt get too much of a headache when you looked up what they are, if you want fluent English why dont you go and read Shakespeare, he's an medieval English poet. By the way you sure do like the word 'Fucking moron' I bet your boyfriend calls you it all the time??,
depalma24 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
You're still a fucking moron. By the way, have you heard of "commas?" You should change your handle to Mr. Run-on.
mintyspace (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Does your mummy know your using such big words,next your really surprise us and start walking and talking at the same time.That was just my opinion,if you dont like it you have every right to say so but calling me a "fucking moron" is not a good way to express your opinion as it proves my theory right that bad arguing is negative so thanks for taking part in this demonstration for me,your obviously a person of great intelligence, good boy, now can you say "banana" here Ill help you,ba-na-na??
depalma24 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Um, this is why they are great film reviewers. They disagree! God, you're a fucking moron.
mintyspace (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yes this is true, and arguing is actually constructive, where as when it turns nasty and personal, thats when it becomes negative, which I think happend with these two a bit, besides if I wanted to watch a TV show with people arguing all the time Ill watch Eastenders
Daxflamemusic (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
everyone argues!
deric8 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
No, Siskel had a speech impediment.
rock8530 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
So hilarious |
